?> Blog | Christ Church

Blog

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from Christ Church in Philadelphia.

Q&A: Jesse Wegman on James Wilson, America’s “Lost Founder”

Christ Church: James Wilson played an essential role in the country’s founding, especially in the creation of the Constitution, yet he doesn’t have the same name recognition as figures like Benjamin Franklin. What drew you to Wilson and his story?

Jesse Wegman: I was drawn to him while working on my last book, which was a history and study of the Electoral College. I had a chapter on the founding era and the adoption of the Electoral College at the Constitutional Convention.

While I was reading Madison’s notes from the 1787 convention, I ran across this guy who just sounded totally different from all the others. He’s talking constantly about political equality, direct participation in government, and popular sovereignty, this fundamental idea that the people are the source of all power and authority in government.

And he’s this Scottish guy that I couldn’t believe I didn’t know. I thought, “Who is he? How can I not know him? He seems central to the whole thing.”

As I read more, I discovered that he is, in fact, at the heart of the writing of the Constitution. He writes the first draft of it. He is essential to so many of the components of it that we know today. And yet he’s gone from American history.

Then I discovered his run from the law at the end of his life, following years of financial collapse that culminated in him being thrown in debtor’s prison twice and then hiding out in the back room of a tavern in North Carolina, where he died of malaria in 1798.

So I thought, “Okay, well, there’s a story there.” Here’s one of the most important of all American founders, and yet nobody seems to know who he is.

Christ Church: Christ Church itself becomes part of that story. What was it like visiting Wilson’s grave while researching the book?

Jesse Wegman: I visited Christ Church in the fall of 2022, I believe, with Jeff Rosen, a professor at George Washington who at the time was leading the National Constitution Center. The two of us were on a bit of a Wilson adventure through the city. But I wanted to see where he now lies.

I was shocked to see that the date chiseled into his headstone is wrong. It’s off by a week. When you look at the exchanges of letters right around his death, everyone refers to the 21st. It’s clear that he died on the evening of the 21st. So I’m wondering at what point it became the 28th.

Christ Church is also relevant to me because it represents the first real attempt to resurrect Wilson. He was exhumed from this almost unmarked grave in coastal North Carolina by a group of very persistent men who understood his significance to the founding and wanted him to have a more proper burial.

He came up on a Navy ship with full honor guard to Philadelphia and was buried outside Christ Church. So I’m sort of in the resurrection business myself and felt some kinship to the church along those lines. This book is yet another attempt to bring this founder back into the American founding narrative.

Christ Church: Wilson had this profound conviction that the people were the ultimate source of political power. How did that set him apart from the other delegates at the Constitutional Convention?

Jesse Wegman: I think what a lot of Americans learn about the founding is an incomplete picture. There is this understanding that the framers generally did not trust the people and did not want them near government. They were elites who felt that they were the best positioned to govern this new country.

That was true for a lot of them. And Wilson has strands of that himself. He definitely thought he was one of the elite. But unlike the others, he had this profound, principled belief in popular rule, and he had it to a degree that none of the others did.

During the debate over the election of the president, Wilson stands up and says, well, obviously this person should be elected by the people directly. They were creating this new job out of whole cloth. There was no president under the Articles of Confederation. To Wilson, it was obvious: How else would you select the president except by a popular vote?

He loses that. He comes back with a different proposal, which is very similar to what we now call the Electoral College. This is one of the ironies of Wilson’s life. He ends up being a conduit for certain mechanisms of government that seem to go directly against his most cherished principles.

He also thought Congress should represent people according to their numbers, what we would call one person, one vote or proportional representation. He could not stand that the Senate gave states equal representation.

He basically says that if you adopt a Senate where states get equal power, that will be a fundamental and perpetual error that will result in “disease, convulsions, and death.”

He’s very clearly on the side of popular rule and defining the relevant unit of governance as the person, not an arbitrarily drawn state.

Christ Church: Many of Wilson’s arguments sound remarkably contemporary. Do you think his ideas speak directly to debates Americans are having about government today?

Jesse Wegman: I think a lot of people today are feeling despairing about our government at all levels: local, state, federal. And I think a lot of that comes from this sense that regular people do not have much influence.

The Electoral College and the Senate are both designed to be anti-majoritarian or function as anti-majoritarian structures. They do not respect popular will as it is expressed through a majority. There is also the Supreme Court, which of course Wilson supported as an institution and was a member of until his death, but which has evolved into an institution that frequently thwarts the will of the people.

I think people today are understandably frustrated at the lack of their ability to translate their wishes into policy and governance.

Wilson can be an inspiring model for people to remember that these ideals were there from the start. Slavery abolitionists in the 19th century cited Wilson. Suffragists pushing for women’s vote cited him. The one person, one vote cases at the Supreme Court, which completely reshaped Congress and redefined American government, literally rely on Wilson for their arguments.

All the way to today, I think he serves in a way as an avatar for our highest democratic ideals.

Christ Church: Wilson was brilliant and enormously influential, but his life also had a deeply flawed and tragic ending. How did you balance those sides of him in the book?

Jesse Wegman: The reason he went bankrupt and ended up in debtor’s prison was because he was a very aggressive land speculator. A lot of his peers were engaged in that at the time, but I think it’s pretty clear that none of them were quite as voracious or reckless as Wilson was.

He had something like four million acres of land to his name at the peak of his ownership. By 1797, he’s living in the back of a tavern. His clothes are falling apart. His body is going to pieces.

It’s a shocking fall from grace. I wanted to emphasize that partly because it explains why he’s absent from our founding narrative. The “lost” part of The Lost Founder has to be explained.

But also because he’s a human. All of these guys are just as human as we are. They did an amazing thing, but they were flawed like we are. They made compromises that undercut their professed ideals, the most obvious being the toleration, if not outright support, of slavery and human bondage, which completely contradicted the essence of the founding principles of this country.

I wanted their hypocrisies and their inconsistencies and their humanity to be at the forefront because I don’t think we can really understand either the founding era or ourselves unless we accept the full complexity of who we are as people and as humans.

Wilson was definitely anti-slavery, but at the Constitutional Convention, he was the one who introduced into the debate what became the Three-Fifths Compromise. That ends up being an enormous concession to the South and defines the first several decades of the country’s existence.

All those contradictions and hypocrisies need to be a part of this story for it to be told well and told right.

Christ Church: When people visit Philadelphia today and walk through places where these early leaders gathered, what aspect of James Wilson’s legacy do you most want them to remember?

Jesse Wegman: I think it’s the idea that people are the source of power in government, or must be for a government to function.

Wilson pushed that harder than any of the other founders. I think that’s a really important reminder for people today that they are the government. They are the source of all authority, and they can change that government when they are unhappy with it. That was Wilson’s central idea. That’s his idea of popular sovereignty.

To him, the Declaration was the ultimate expression of that principle. It was a people throwing off one government and declaring that they were creating a new one because they were unhappy with the way they were being governed.

And there’s a good case to be made that Wilson helped inspire its language. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal” is a very strong echo of an essay that Wilson wrote in 1768 when he was just 26 years old. We know Thomas Jefferson was influenced by this essay.

Perhaps most importantly, Wilson added the phrase “We the People” to the beginning of the Constitution. That is, in its way, importing the Declaration spirit, that popular sovereignty spirit, to make sure that what everyone knows at the outset is that this document is ordained and established not by the king, not by God, not by the states, not by the federal government, but by the people.

That, I think, is an essential part of what Wilson understood functional democratic government to be, and I think it’s what we need to remember today.

Christ Church: Who would you consider Wilson’s biggest ally at the Constitutional Convention?

Jesse Wegman: During the convention, he and Madison worked hand in hand for a lot of the summer because they were both very much in favor of proportional representation. They both did not like the idea of a Senate that gave small states the same power as big states.

Madison even came around to his belief in the popular vote for president. In the middle of the summer, Madison says, “I actually agree. I think it would be best to elect the president directly. It’s not going to happen.”

He explains that the Southern states, if you have a direct vote for president, don’t have very big voting populations if you leave out all the enslaved people. They want a system of choosing the president that gives them some kind of credit for those enslaved people. That’s what they get with the Three-Fifths Compromise combined with the Electoral College.

So Madison is essentially saying, “We’re not going to have a direct vote for president because of slavery.”

On different issues, Wilson has different allies. But I’d say across the board, probably Madison is his closest.

Christ Church: Wilson was also one of the most active voices at the Constitutional Convention, correct?

Jesse Wegman: Gouverneur Morris was number one, and right behind him was Wilson at number two. I think Madison is probably number three.

Wilson was there every single day of the summer, including the 10-day stretch in the middle when everyone else went on vacation. He and four other delegates stayed back, forming the Committee of Detail, which is where they wrote the first draft of the Constitution.

Christ Church: How did Wilson ultimately die?

Jesse Wegman: He died of malaria. In 1798, malaria was endemic to that entire coastal region of North Carolina and Virginia. People were sickened in large numbers and died in large numbers. It’s a horrible, horrible way to die.

They didn’t call it malaria then. They didn’t even know what caused it. But he got sick in July of 1798 and died in August.

Christ Church: And how did Wilson eventually make his way from North Carolina back to Christ Church?

Jesse Wegman: In the early 20th century, a Pennsylvania historian named Bert Konkle decided that Wilson was important enough both to give a biography to and to find out where he was buried.

He found out that Wilson was buried in Edenton, North Carolina, on the edge of a plantation, with almost no fanfare at all. There was no obituary. There was no public announcement of his death, even though he was a Supreme Court justice.

So Konkle started a letter campaign and arranged for an honor guard to go down to North Carolina. They exhumed Wilson in a ceremony in 1906. There are photos of the ceremony.

They brought him up on a Navy ship to Philadelphia and marched him from the harbor to the church. The public was allowed to process by his casket, and then he was buried where he now lies outside the church.

With the wrong death date.

Christ Church: Finally, tell us about the book and where readers can find it.

Jesse Wegman: The book is The Lost Founder: James Wilson and the Forgotten Fight for a People’s Constitution. It’s published by Celadon Books, and it is available wherever books are sold.

 

Benjamin Rush and Early American Medicine

Benjamin Rush (1746–1813) was a Founding Father, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, a social reformer, educator, and college founder. When describing his contributions to the Revolutionary War, he simply remarked: “I aimed well.” Widely considered the father of American psychiatry, Rush also championed a radical medical practice known as heroic medicine, which emphasized extreme bloodletting and purging.

Heroic medicine—sometimes called heroic depletion theory—emerged in 17th-century France, popularized by a Parisian physician nicknamed “Le Grand Saigneur” (“The Grand Bloodletter”). However, it did not coalesce into a dominant school of thought until the 18th century, largely due to Rush, who helped mainstream the aggressive treatment. As a founder of the University of Pennsylvania’s medical school, Rush was highly respected in the medical community. His response to the Yellow Fever epidemic of 1793 helped solidify heroic medicine’s prominence. That year, he wrote:

“I have found bleeding to be useful, not only in cases where the pulse was full and quick but where it was slow and tense. I have bled twice in many, and in one acute case, four times, with the happiest effect. I consider intrepidity in the use of the lancet, at present, to be necessary, as it is in the use of mercury and jalap, in this insidious and ferocious disease.”

The practices of bloodletting, purging, and induced sweating were not new. They originated with humoral theory, dating back to Hippocrates. Humoral theory posited that the body was governed by four humors—black bile, yellow bile, phlegm, and blood—and that health depended on maintaining a balance among them. Physicians aimed to restore balance by prompting various bodily discharges. While this was originally a measured practice, heroic medicine took it to extremes—removing up to 80% of a patient’s blood volume. Purging was achieved with massive doses of Senna, tartar emetic, and calomel, often leading to acute mercury poisoning. Sweating was induced by applying blisters to the skin.

As Yellow Fever decimated Philadelphia, many doctors fled the city. Rush remained, treating up to 100 patients a day. He subjected patients—and himself—to intensive regimens of bloodletting and purgatives. Many died under his care. He later acknowledged that some treatments, such as vinegar-soaked blankets, mercury rubs, and cold baths, had failed.

Though celebrated for his courage and commitment during the epidemic, Rush’s methods faced growing scrutiny. Journalist William Cobbett, among others—including some of Rush’s former teachers—criticized his practices. By this time, many in the medical field were moving away from heroic medicine and toward emerging scientific methods. Cobbett accused Rush of killing more patients than he saved. Rush sued for libel and won, but his reputation suffered. His medical practice declined, and critics went so far as to blame him for hastening the death of Benjamin Franklin.

In 1799, George Washington was treated with heroic methods on his deathbed: he was bled repeatedly, given mercury chloride, and subjected to blistering with cantharidin to induce sweating. He died shortly after. Although Rush was not present, some blamed him for the outcome. Ironically, the only doctor who opposed the bloodletting was one of Rush’s former students.

Rush himself insisted on being bled shortly before his own death.

Blog post written by Tess Rauscher

There Are No Kings in America

“Doctor, what have we got: A republic or a monarchy?” Ben Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Christ Church was founded in 1695 by members of the Church of England. It was small, and wooden, and you could place your palm on the ceiling. Fifty years later, the church was the tallest building in the Colonies, holding the record longer than the Empire State Building eventually would. London had been ruined by its own city plans in the Great London Fire, afterward, the Georgian architecture style boomed. Christ Church was the finest example of it in America. It had a door set, set aside just for the king; it had a pew, set aside just for the king. The king would never come, but revolution did. After victory, the King’s Door was renamed the President’s Door, but the president would never come either— George Washington used the same door as everyone else, critical of anything that evoked the self-inflation of the monarchy.

In colonial times, the church was the epicenter of social life, and with social life comes political life too. Commonly known attendees of the church include Revolutionary War leaders like George Washington, Robert Morris, Benjamin Franklin, and Betsy Ross. The rector Jacob Duche led the opening prayers for the First Continental Congress in 1774. In 1785, Anglicans had their own convention where they elected Reverend William White, the rector of Christ Church, as their president. He, along with other church leaders, drafted the church’s new constitution. White was one of the clergy who would work to create the draft of the first American Prayer Book. He was consecrated in England. Though he had sworn to the king, William White publicly sided with the revolution after the signing of the Declaration of Independence. After the war, he released a pamphlet with the foundations of thought for the Episcopal church. He suggested a radical, and eventually adopted reform, of including lay people in the church’s decision making bodies. He became the first Episcopal Bishop of Pennsylvania, the first Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal church, and was foundational in establishing a religion independent of England. He continued to serve at Christ Church, and he is buried in our chancel.

“Human rights can only be assured among a virtuous people. The general government… can never be in danger of denigrating into a monarchy, an oligarchy, an aristocracy, or any despotic or oppressive form so long as there is any virtue in the body of the people.” -George Washington

“There are no kings in America./ Only gilded men we can topple/ again and again.” – Alieen Cassinetto

Remembering Benjamin Franklin

In 1728, at age twenty-two, Ben Franklin, freshly returned to his  chosen home of Philadelphia, wrote a mocking epitaph for himself: “The Body of B. Franklin, Printer; like the Cover of an old Book, Its  Contents torn out, And stript of its Lettering and Gilding, Lies here, Food  for Worms. But the Work shall not be wholly lost; For it will, as he believ’d,  appear once more, In a new & more perfect Edition, Corrected and  amended By the Author.” 

At age twenty one Ben Franklin had his first attack of pleurisy. At age  twenty-eight, he had a second attack, this time with an abscess on the left  lung, leaving him vulnerable. In his later years, the attacks came readily,  along with a sizable bladder stone.  

In 1790, at age eighty-four, Ben Franklin writhed in bed, as he had,  for nearly twelve months. His attending physician would send an account  of his time for publication soon after Franklin’s death: sixteen days before  death, he was seized with high fever; soon after, he reported symptoms of  chest pain, cough, and difficulty breathing; five days before death, in his  lungs, an abscess formed and pressed against his lungs. The abscess burst.  He threw up. He expired around 11’o clock. 

While it was his final days, he was still Ben Franklin. He would lie in  bed and be over taken with paroxysms; he would take large doses of  laudanum. But between these attacks, he dilly dallied with reading and good  conversation, with business of both private and public affair. “I hope you  live many years more,” his daughter said. “I hope not,” he replied. His final  words, allegedly: “A dying man can do nothing easily.” Upon his passing,  Count Miraebau declared to the French National Assembly: “He was able  to restrain thunderbolts and tyrants.”  

France went into national mourning. They sent tributes about  Franklin to the senate. They were ignored. James Madison asked his  colleagues to wear symbols of mourning for one month. The House of  Representatives agreed. The Senate declined, influenced, perhaps, by John  Adams, who had long held disregard for Franklin, as did Richard Henry  Lee. Thomas Jefferson asked the executive branch to wear mourning  symbols. George Washington declined, fearing it was too similar to how 

royalty was honored. Ben Franklin would not be publicly mourned in  America, at least not nationally. 

On April 21st, 1790, Philadelphia held Ben Franklin’s funeral. 20,000  people attended. The city was 28,000 people big.  

It was silent, despite the size of the crowds. The procession ended at  Christ Church. Every clergyman of the city walked before the corpse.  William Smith, a rival of Franklin’s, performed the eulogy. The city was in  mourning, and they stood reverent before a man who had lived a large life,  who had symbolized for them the formative values of an infant nation. 

A few days later, the Pennsylvania Mercury published a letter of  Franklin’s, originally sent after the death of his brother John, to comfort a  family member:  

“We are spirits. That bodies should be lent us, while they can afford us  pleasure, assist us in acquiring knowledge, or doing good to our fellow  creatures, is a kind and benevolent act of God – when they become unfit  for these purposes, and afford us pain instead of pleasure – instead of an  aid, become an incumbrance, and answer none of the intentions for which  they were given, it is equally kind and benevolent that a way is provided by  which we may get rid of them. Death is that way.”

The Rev. Timothy Safford, Rector, announces March 2022 retirement

Read Tim Safford’s letter to the parish and community here.

The Rev. Timothy Safford on Palm Sunday, 2021

FROM THE VESTRY OF CHRIST CHURCH, APRIL 18, 2021

Grace to you, and we greet you in the peace of the risen Christ.

As announced in worship on April 18, the Christ Church vestry has accepted the resignation of the nineteenth rector, the Reverend Timothy Browning Safford. Tim’s last day as our rector will be on March 31, 2022, just shy of his 23rd anniversary at Christ Church.

Throughout his time with us, Tim led us toward true koinonia grounded in agape love and expanded our vision of welcome of ourselves and others with the weekly words “Whoever you are and wherever you find yourself on the journey of faith, you belong here, just as you are.”

The vestry has decided to look to this time as one of immense opportunity. In the midst of sadness, there is room for joy and excitement for our next chapter. Our congregation is healthy. During the pandemic, our virtual numbers have remained steady. Over 100 people came to celebrate the risen Christ on Easter Sunday. We are steadfast in our stewardship. All of this demonstrates our love for each other and Christ Church, and that will not waiver.

As we work together this next year and then into the period of transition, we are blessed to have a supportive clergy and who will assist in maintaining continuity. The vestry is deeply grateful to the Reverend Susan Richardson, Parker Kitterman, Cecilia Wagner, the staff members who will continue to shepherd our spiritual life, and for the Reverend Palmer Hartl, who will continue to serve. Barbara Hogue, Executive Director of the Preservation Trust, will continue her work to expand the Trust’s reach and engagement with the community. Each of us has work to do if we are to live out the mission we identified in our recent Strategic Planning process. That Study laid out a vision for our future, and work has already begun to implement that vision. The work will continue and it is up to us to achieve it.

Transitions happen at the best of times. Our responsibility as a congregation is to decide how we wish to manage it. Over the next year, we will celebrate Tim’s ministry while searching for an interim rector who will join us. At that time, we will continue the work of discerning who is to be and then calling the twentieth rector of Christ Church. As Bishop Daniel Gutiérrez reminds us, our next rector has already been called; our job is to pray for guidance to find that person.

The vestry will offer space for the congregation to come together at a parish-wide forum on Sunday May 2nd, immediately after the Sunday service. We will hear directly from Tim regarding his transition. We will then hold listening sessions to hear from you. The dates for these gatherings are at the end of this letter. You should also feel free to reach out to any member of the Clergy or vestry. We are here to listen.

This will be a time for deep prayer for all of us, as we seek God’s guidance. To assist us in this important ministry, Bill Myers, a former vestry member, will lead our newly created Prayer Committee that will pray for our congregation and all those involved in our transition.

There will be other opportunities for you to offer your time and talents as our incredible journey unfolds. Our love for Tim, each other, Christ Church and the Risen Christ will carry us through, united as one by the Holy Spirit, as we begin the next chapter in our history.

Signed by the Christ Church Vestry, April 18, 2021

FringeArts Artistic Producer Katy Dammers Hosted a Virtual Panel About Choreographer David Gordon

Today at 3 pm! FringeArts artistic producer Katy Dammers will host a virtual panel discussion about the layered nature of choreographer David Gordon’s artistic practice as seen in our critically acclaimed production THE PHILADELPHIA MATTER/1972-2020. The panel discussion will include archivist Patsy Gay, performer Valda Setterfield, and writer Suzanne Carboneau. Learn more at neighborhood-house.com

Major funding for THE PHILADELPHIA MATTER, 1972-2020 is provided by The Pew Center for Arts & Heritage.

FYI Philly/Channel 6 Features Neighborhood House; Panel Discussion Saturday!

Did you miss the Eagles game to watch the FYI Philly segment on Channel 6 yesterday? If not, we bet you wish you did! Here is a highlight featuring Neighborhood House and FringeArts.

On Saturday, American master choreographer David Gordon joins our Executive Director Barbara Hogue for a panel discussion on THE PHILADELPHIA MATTER-1972/2020 along with his collaborators and two of our Philadelphia-based performers.

How does an 84-year-old choreographer re-envision his craft of 60+ years during a pandemic? Join us at 3 p.m.  to find out. (We will post a link on neighborhood-house.com tomorrow!)

 

TimeOut New York Calls NH-Commissioned Work “Best Live Theater to Stream This Week”

The great reviews keep rolling in! TimeOut New York counts David Gordon’s THE PHILADELPHIA MATTER-1972/2020 among this week’s Best Live Theater to Stream Online. Neighborhood House commissioned the work, premiering tonight at #PhillyFringe2020, with major funding provided by The Pew Center for Arts & Heritage.

For tickets and more information, visit our project page on the NH website.

Look for coverage on CBS 3 today as well!

New York Times Reviews Neighborhood House’s “The Philadelphia Matter- 1972/2020”

The Philadelphia Matter
We are thrilled to announce today’s New York Times review of “The Philadelphia Matter- 1972/2020.” Read the full article.

Produced by Neighborhood House, the performance will premiere on Thursday at 7 p.m. For tickets and more information, click here. On Wednesday, see a preview of the project at the Farmers Market at Christ Church! Performers will present from 4-7 p.m.

** Major support for this project is provided by The Pew Center for Arts & Heritage.

Historic Quaker Treasures Added To Unprecedented Digital Archival Effort

18th century manumissions and 17th century burial records are among tens of thousands of early Quaker documents recently added to a major digitization project spearheaded by Christ Church Preservation Trust. Contributed by Haverford and Swarthmore Colleges, these records will be available to free online access for the first time.  

The “Digitizing Philadelphia’s Historic Congregational Records” project began two years ago, when the Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) awarded a Hidden Collections grant to Christ Church Preservation Trust. The $385,000 award — funded by the Andrew Mellon Foundation — allowed the Trust to digitize the records of eleven of Philadelphia’s historic congregations, including the African Episcopal Church of St. Thomas, Gloria Dei, Christ Church, Mikveh Israel, the First, Second and Third Presbyterian Churches, St. Paul’s and St. Peter’s Episcopal Churches, St. George’s Methodist Church and the First Baptist Church.  

Since the spring of 2018, more than 60,000 records have been scanned at The Athenaeum of Philadelphia’s Regional Digital Imaging Center. Scholars will be able to access these documents through the American Theological Library Association’s religion and theology digital collections portal and OPenn, the University of Pennsylvania Libraries Open Data Portal. Ranging from the late 17th century through 1870, these digital archives contain undiscovered portals into the relationship between religion and politics in colonial America. 

“Unlike other major genealogical sites,” says Carol Smith, Archivist at Christ Church Preservation Trust, “this project makes research information free and easily accessible to an international audience.” 

Before now, Philadelphia Quaker records in the collections of Haverford and Swarthmore Colleges were only available online through a commercial site. 

“We were excited to be able to bring these records out from behind the paywall and make them more widely available,” says Pat O’Donnell, recently retired Archivist at Friends Historical Library. “This was really important to us.” 

 The Quaker records — approximately 30,000 already completed scans — consist of minutes of Quaker monthly and quarterly business meetings as well as documentation of births, deaths, marriages, burials, removals (transfers), and manumissions in the City of Philadelphia before about 1800. Historical highlights include manumission records — such as a 1776 entry for Dinah, a formerly enslaved woman who saved Germantown’s Stenton from destruction by the British army. Documents also detail Quaker involvement in the American Revolution itself revealing both the “sufferings” of Friends due to their commitment to a peace testimony as well as their dealings with those members who were involved in the Conflict. 

“These collections are part of the bedrock of the beginnings of Pennsylvania,” says Mary A. Crauderueff, Curator of Quaker Collections at Haverford College Libraries.  Their inclusion in this digital portal makes them “accessible in a larger context alongside those of other historic congregations.”  

Members of the public can participate in this effort to preserve and promote local history by transcribing these records, now available on one unified website at www.philadelphiacongregations.org. Already accessible by researchers and genealogists, the collection will be of greater use once records are transcribed and searchable. More than a dozen transcribers have worked steadily through the pandemic on this effort. 

The Athenaeum of Philadelphia, in partnership with the Digitizing Philadelphia’s Historic Congregational Records project team, is hosting a transcription workshop this fall. Volunteers can attend one or all four days of the free seminar — via Zoom — on September 14, 16, 21 or 23 at 10 a.m. Workshop leaders will review the project, share some of its archival finds, and teach basic transcription. 

Please contact Carol Smith, Christ Church Archivist, with further questions at csmith@christchurchphila.org

David Gordon’s THE PHILADELPHIA MATTER – 1972/2020 Premieres Here September 10

David Gordon‘s THE PHILADELPHIA MATTER – 1972/2020 will premiere on September 10, the opening day of the 2020 Philadelphia Fringe Festival, and will stream on our website through the end of the festival on October 4.

Commissioned by Christ Church Neighborhood House with funding from The Pew Center for Arts & Heritage, the performance further evolves the legacy of Gordon’s The Matter works (first presented in 1972, and most recently re-conceived for MoMA in 2018) and brings the choreographer’s trademark blurring of everyday life and performance-as well as his self-reflexive integration of process into presentation-into the present, with all its creative obstacles and potentials. The work, made with video collaborator and editor Jorge Cousineau, features more than 30 Philadelphia performers in addition to Wally Cardona and Pick Up Performance Co(s) members Valda Setterfield and Karen Graham.

We will announce more as Fringe Arts unveils festival plans. Read more about our project here!